patching...
Update: Welcome to New Milford Patch
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Councilman Austin Ashley

Friday, March 15, 2013

Court Decision on Grant's Lawsuit Coming Next Week

Councilwoman Hedy Grant's lawsuit to remove Borough Attorney Marc Leibman went before Superior Court Judge Joseph Conte on Friday afternoon.

Listening to arguments from several attorneys, Superior Court Judge Joseph Conte announced that he will issue a decision sometime next week on Councilwoman Hedy Grant's lawsuit to remove Marc Leibman as the borough attorney. Grant's lawsuit, which was filed in February, called for the court to invalidate the appointment of Borough Attorney Marc Leibman on the basis that his prior representation of Councilman Austin Ashley regarding the potential development of the United Water property by the S. Hekemian Group created a conflict of interest. Her suit further stated that Ashley was "disqualified by self-interest" from voting for the appointment of Leibman as Borough Attorney. Grant seeks a judicial determination that Ashley had a "…

TommyIce

9:13 am on Monday, March 18, 2013

What I would like to know is why do three Republicans (who support development of the UW property) want the personal attorney of a Democrat who is against the development of UW to be the boro's attorney? Seems to me there is a story there.   more ›

Wednesday, February 6, 2013

Grant Files Suit to Remove Borough Attorney, Claims 'Pay to Play'

Grant petitions the court to invalidate the appointment of Marc Leibman as Borough Attorney citing conflict of interest and 'pay to play.'

Councilwoman Hedy Grant has filed a lawsuit against Councilman Austin Ashley, Mayor Ann Subrizi and the Borough of New Milford petitioning the court to invalidate the appointment of Borough Attorney, Marc Leibman of the law firm Kaufman, Semeraro, Bern, Deutsch & Leibman. The complaint, filed in Superior Court in Hackensack, submits that as Leibman's client in the matter before the New Milford Zoning Board regarding the potential development of the United Water property by the S. Hekemian Group, Ashley was "disqualified by self-interest" from voting for the appointment of Leibman as Borough Attorney. Grant seeks a judicial determination that Ashley had a "disqualifying conflict of interest" by nominating and voting on the appointment of …

Comment_arrow

Sandcastle

10:34 pm on Monday, February 11, 2013

I agree that this is exactly the issue this matter rests upon, Ulises. If Liebman gave free or discounted services to Ashley - even if not explicitly anticipating some future benefit - it would appear to be a re-payment of those services (in the form of a retainer at public expense) for Ashley to recommend him for Boro atty.   more ›

Got a Hot Tip?
 
 

Videos