Pascrell Easily Beats Rothman In Bitter Primary
Rothman concedes race to Congressman from Paterson.
Rep. Bill Pascrell easily defeated Rep. Steve Rothman on Tuesday in the hotly contested race for the Democratic nomination in New Jersey’s 9th Congressional district.
With 98% percent of the vote counted, Pascrell led Rothman 60 percent to 40 percent, the Associated Press reported.
Rothman conceded the race shortly 10:30pm, telling supporters that he'd likely never run for office again and would throw his support behind Pascrell, NorthJersey.com reported.
On the undercard of the Pascrell-Rothman showdown, Englewood Rabbi Shmuley Boteach won the Rupublican nomination in the 9 district and will face Pascrell in November.
The race between the two Democrats and former friends in the reconfigured 9th Congressional District, which includes parts of Bergen, Passaic and Hudson Counties, turned contentious and bitter almost from the outset. Pascrell criticized Rothman for moving to Englewood, where the latter was mayor in the 1980s, to challenge him instead of keeping his residence in Fair Lawn and challenging Republican Rep. Scott Garrett in the 5th Congressional district.
The 2010 census determined that New Jersey's population grew more slowly than that of other states, and the Congressional Redistricting Commission consolidated the state’s 13 congressional districts into 12.
“You moved twice, to run the first time and this time,” Pascrell said to Rothman at one debate, marked by heated exchanges, according to NJ Spotlight. “If you’re such a progressive, then why didn’t you run against the leader of the Tea Party? Instead you choose to run against your ‘friend.’”
Pascrell, when asked why he himself didn’t move to challenge Garrett or Republican Rodney Frelinghuysen, said, “I lived in Paterson all my life. I don’t have to move.”
Former President Bill Clinton campaigned for Pascrell, who was a staunch supporter of Hillary Clinton in the 2008 presidential primaries, while Rothman, who backed now President Barack Obama, met with Obama at the White House and claimed his backing, although the President didn’t technically endorse him, according to a Huffington Post report.
At a debate at Bergen Community College on May 7, Pascrell was asked to say something nice about his opponent.
“I think he has been a loyal Democrat," Pascrell said. “When it suits his purpose.”
At the same debate, Rothman accused Pascrell of compromising too often with Republicans.
"There's a difference between negotiating in good faith with people on the other side of the aisle, and there's caving in to the other side of the aisle," Rothman said.
But the two candidates’ positions on major issues had been remarkably similar, and after early positive ads in which the two candidates, both of whom were elected to Congress in 1996, simply introduced themselves to voters, they have battled throughout the campaign over who more effectively advocates for "traditional" Democratic values.
On Monday night, mere hours before voters went to the polls, a New Jersey state judge denied Rothman’s request to impound 2,000 vote-by-mail ballots. Rothman had sought the impoundment because of potential voting irregularities with ballots in Passaic County and Paterson.
Passaic County's chief elections administrator granted Rothman's request earlier in the day, but Superior Court Judge Ernest Caposella overturned it during a hearing Monday evening in Paterson, The Huffington Post reported.
Have a question or a news tip? Email the editor Ann Piccirillo at annpiccirillo@yahoo.com. Or, follow us on Facebook and Twitter. For news straight to your email inbox, sign up for our daily newsletter.
Martha
9:03 am on Wednesday, June 6, 2012
We should abolish political parties althogether as they serve no purpose in this country. The priority of a politician should be for the benefit of ALL of the people that he represents and should not be based on party lines. What works for the American people should not be held "hostage" by a politician simply because of one's party.
It is abhorent for Mr. Rothman to state that one should not compromise with the other party. Mr. Rothman implied that it was OK to negotiate but not to cave in. You can negotiate all you want but in the end, there must be a result and according to Mr. Rothman, if the result is not in your favor, you have "caved in." What a poor definition of the word compromise. Additionally, was it not disgraceful for Mr. Rothman's campaign to urge people to switch parties so that they could vote for him? Not all politicians are angels; however, I am truly happy that he was not elected. Any politician who puts his agenda, or, his party's agenda ahead of the good of the American people should be given the "boot" out of office.
Darlene
11:11 am on Wednesday, June 6, 2012
I had no opinion of either candidate prior to reading this article, but when I read that Pascrell, a Democrat, is accused of compromising with Republicans, that made me take notice. Apparently Rep. Rothman is not aware that "compromise" is a GOOD thing. He sought to criticize Rep. Pascrell but instead made Pascrell look both sensible and results oriented. If Rothman truly feels that compromise is a bad thing, he has no business being in government. That kind of thinking is what keeps so much from being accomplished in our deeply divided country. Good riddance!