Mayor and Council Pass Ordinance to Exceed 2 Percent Cap on Municipal Budget
To meet the costs of the special and unanticipated projects included in the capital expenditures, the borough passes an ordinance to exceed the 2 percent cap.
The Mayor and Council introduced the 2013 Municipal budget at Monday's work session. Prior to the introduction, an ordinance was passed authorizing the Mayor and Council to exceed the municipal budget appropriations limits and to establish a cap bank.
Local governments can circumvent the 2.5 percent cap on municipal budget increases if an ordinance is adopted establishing a "cap" bank. The passage of the ordinance permits the governing body, in certain situations, to increase its budget in an amount not to exceed 3.5 percent of the preceding year’s appropriations level.
The law establishes that the cap can be exceeded without having to go to the public for a vote if a town needs to meet certain capital expenditures, including debt service, or if there is an increase in pension contributions or health care costs.
In order to meet the costs of the special and unanticipated capital projects included in the 2013 capital portion of the budget, the borough will need to exceed the 2 percent cap in order to fund the projects. Below is a breakdown of those capital expenditures.
The special projects, totaling $4,002,500, include:
- Hirschfeld Brook Flood Mitigation: $1.4 million
- NMFD Co. 1 Firehouse Renovation: $736,000
- NMFD Co. 2 Firehouse Renovation: $1,666,500
- NMPD Headquarters Design: $200,000
The on-going projects, totaling $371,000, include:
- DPW Curb Program: $25,000
- DPW Road Pavement Program: $200,000
- DPW Storm Drain Installations: $100,000
- NMFD Co. 1 Equipment Replacement: $23,000
- NMFD Co. 2 Equipment Replacement: $23,000
Unanticipated Capital Requests, totaling $331,600, include:
- Replacement of fence in DPW yard: $2,200
- Color Printer in Building Dpt: $1,000
- DPW Compactor Safety Rehab: $15,000
- DPW Dump Truck with Plow: $110,000
- DPW Guide Rail New Bridge Road: $8,000
- DPW Heaters for Garage: $33,000
- NMPD Ford Expedition with Tow Capacity: $45,000
- NMPD Pistol Range Safety Rehabilitation: $20,00
- NMPD Police Systems Server Replacement: $12,000
- NMPD Police Systems/Systems Upgrade: $34,000
- NMPL Replacement of Circulation Desk: $24,400
- NMREC Lighting Detection System: $27,000
Patch will be providing updates to the budget introduction.
|
|
Ulises
9:13 am on Tuesday, March 12, 2013
NMPD Pistol Range Safety Rehabilitation: $20,000 - that makes me happy. Thank you Chief & M&C.
Joe Loonam
12:24 pm on Tuesday, March 12, 2013
does anyone know how each council member voted?
TommyIce
1:01 pm on Tuesday, March 12, 2013
What exactly is the Circulation Desk in the police department that would cost $24,000+ ?
Anthony
1:43 pm on Tuesday, March 12, 2013
I would think it has to do with the managing of files and evidence, and provides a way to track who "checks" things out and "returns" them.
Ann Piccirillo
4:15 pm on Tuesday, March 12, 2013
That was a typo on my part--it's NMPL--public library.
Donna Tomasini
3:44 pm on Tuesday, March 12, 2013
Joe,
They all voted yes.
Maryann Milligan
6:02 pm on Tuesday, March 12, 2013
shame on our governing board
Celeste Scavetta
7:43 pm on Tuesday, March 12, 2013
Where in the budget line items will the blatant, wasteful New Milford Democratic intra party dispute and lawsuit be deducted from? How much will New Milford taxpayers be burdened with to settle this horrifying waste of time and money? I'd love to know what expensive line item will HAVE to be removed and replaced by this nonsensical legal battle. I can only imagine it will be one of the more expensive items above.
Lori Barton
8:18 am on Thursday, March 14, 2013
2 thoughts. 1. Was there ANY discussion on eliminating the medical benefits for the M&C? Possible savings in the $100,000 range. 2. The REPUBLICAN mayor could have exercised her option to retain the FORMER borough attorney (Madaio) for 30 days. This would have provided the time to investigate the possibility of a conflict of interest by appointing Liebman. Instead, with NO borough attorney present, she asked LIEBMAN (before his appointment) if it was a conflict of interest. He said no. This entire mess could have been avoided if only the mayor had done her due diligence. So who's fault is it that we will be stuck with legal fees?