patching...
Update: Follow New Milford Patch on Facebook »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Mayor and Council Authorize Rezoning Study of United Water Property

With Councilman Austin Ashley recusing himself, council votes unanimously to approve rezoning study.

 

The Mayor and Council voted to authorize Phillips Preiss and Grygiel, LLC (the appointed Zoning Board planner in the United Water property hearings) to proceed with a rezoning study of the 13-acre United Water property during Monday night's work session. 

The United Water property is currently zoned Residential A, which is for single family homes, but New Milford Redevelopment Associates has filed an application with the Zoning Board seeking variances to build:

  • 70,500 sq. ft. supermarket 
  • 4300 sq. ft. bank with two drive-thru lanes 
  • Four-story 221 unit multi-family housing complex, that will include an affordable housing component, a 428-space multi-level parking garage and a pool

The borough's previous planner, Dennis Kirwan LLC, prepared a rezoning study of the property that was presented to the Mayor and Council during its June 27, 2011 meeting. The initial review of the site by Kirwan recommended that the site be zoned commercial, but with a special ordinance that would put specific parameters on its future use.  However, during Monday's meeting, Mayor Ann Subrizi said that the Kirwan study did not go far enough and a more comprehensive report is needed. 

Specifically, Subrizi wants the study to address the location of New Milford's affordable housing requirement under COAH (Council On Affordable Housing) that the Master Plan rests solely on the United Water property. 

Subrizi wants the planner to determine if there is any other part of town where this affordable housing obligation can be met.

Councilwoman Hedy Grant questioned whether the action of the Mayor and Council to authorize a rezoning study would be permitted since New Milford Redevelopment Associates has an application currently pending before the Zoning Board.

Subrizi responded that the Mayor and Council can either do nothing and let the application proceed before the Zoning Board, or rezone the property and come to a "less intensive use" of the property that will be better for the town. 

"I need the planner to say we can fulfill COAH elsewhere or we can rezone [the property] for a less intensive use," Subrizi said. 

The resolution specifies that the planner should undertake an examination of all the elements of rezoning that property and produce data that the Mayor and Council can consider in deciding whether to change the zoning. 

Subrizi said, "I want to know if it is even possible to move our COAH obligation elsewhere."

Borough Attorney Mark Madaio said that the authorization of a rezoning study does not affect the application currently before the Zoning Board. 

"If the Mayor and Council rezone the property, the applicant may like it," Madaio said. "If not, they'll continue the way they're going because they're already seeking variances for non-compliant use."

Because Councilman Austin Ashley retained counsel to represent him in his objection to the development of the United Water property by New Milford Redevelopment Associates, he recused himself from voting on this resolution. Councilwoman Hedy Grant asked Madaio if Ashley can vote on the resolution authorizing the rezoning study since it is not about the actual property itself, but on a study to be done by a planner.

Madaio said that it is within the scope of Ashley's legal options to recuse himself from voting on the matter. 

With Ashley's recusal, the council voted unanimously to authorize a rezoning study by the planner, Phillips Preiss and Grygiel, LLC, at a cost not to exceed $5000, an amount that can be covered by money already allocated to the Planning Board's professional services line in the budget.

However, Madaio said that he had relayed to New Milford Redevelopment Associates the Mayor and Council's interest in the developer putting more money aside to cover the cost of this study. As of Monday's meeting, Madaio had not heard a response from them. 

The next meeting of the Mayor and Counci will be on Wednesday, May 30.

Have a question or news tip? Contact editor Ann Piccirillo at annpiccirillo@yahoo.com, or find us on Facebook or Twitter. For news straight to your inbox, sign up for our daily newsletter.


 

Related Topics: Mayor and Council work session, United Water property, and rezoning United Water property

Jimmy Drake

7:24 am on Tuesday, May 15, 2012

Wasn't that cute that austin recused himself ?!?

Now maybe he'll get the democratic club to give back the $520.00 United Water donated to the Democratic club in 2010?

I got a better chance of getting pregnant.

Reply
Comment_arrow

LMA

11:40 am on Tuesday, May 15, 2012

Although I do not know the specifics of the situation you are commenting on, you can state your opinion/point without sarcasm and arrogance; it is totally disrespectful and quite low to take that route.

And did you know that the Hekemian family donated thousands of dollars to the Republican party, especially to Governor Christie? Perhaps, you can ask a member of the Republican party, or, yourself, to refund that money as well! It is not a one-way street! Donations work both ways!

Comment_arrow

Michelle

9:45 pm on Monday, June 11, 2012

This is an interesting article: http://www.northjersey.com/bergen/Developer_takes_over_Bergen_Dems_group.html

The Hekemian's are definitely interested in politics.

Jimmy Drake

4:05 pm on Tuesday, May 15, 2012

I take it you don't know me and like so many other detractors, you stay anonymous.

I AM A democrat and have been for for 45 years. and currently running against the New Milford democratic club candidate (who BTW LOST against me last election) for County Committee in my district. ANY democrat, republican or unafilliated who knows what is the truth knows I'm right in lambasting them.

The people who get flooded out all the time did deserve to know that the DEMS did receive that amount from the very people who flood them out and now here they are asking these very same often naive neighbors for their vote!

I am not talking about the County, State or Federal government. I am talking about my/our town and the innocents who are being taken advantage of .

I believe this charade of the two democrats who attend SOD meetings do so only to be seen. After reading about 45 emails regarding this effort, I see no instance where they actually DID something.

I am tired of seeing good, decent, hard working and proud family men and women being played.

I saw a chart where republicans did receive about 1/50th of what was given to democrats. if you like, I'll try and copy and paste that chart for you. and BTW NONE of which went to the new milford republican club.

Reply

David Bednarcik

10:04 pm on Tuesday, May 15, 2012

Why are we potentially doing more development in an area that is already seen a lot of flooding?

Reply

Jimmy Drake

6:52 am on Wednesday, May 16, 2012

David, that is what the group is all about.

From what I can see, they have great management, focus, energy and sincere dedication to Stop Over Development. Hence the acronym.

and they will NOT be any kind of political tool.

Reply

David Bednarcik

7:21 am on Wednesday, May 16, 2012

Jimmy, I assume you mean the SOD?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jimmy Drake

12:49 pm on Wednesday, May 16, 2012

Yes. Thanks for getting back to me.

Great Americans fighting for their homes, neighbors and the town itself.

Barbara

11:32 pm on Monday, July 23, 2012

New Milford's mayor stated " the only way to stop overdevelopment is to stop people from coming here".

This is not a statement I want to hear from a leader of the town I live in. It sounds like she has given up.  It sounds like a cop out to me. It sounds weak and not inspiring. It sounds like she has no fight left. ( Oradell beat Walgreens. I want Mayor Murray as our leader!)

I want a leader who is willing to take the responsibility for land management. A leader who knows what is right and wants to protect the well being of all citizens. I want a leader who holds the vision of all the citizens not just the few or her own. I want a leader who is forward thinking in protecting the size of our town and the development of its land.

We are taught at a young age to be smart about what we are responsible for.
Remember the story of the three little pigs? The ones who did not act responsibly lost everything. The one who was smart and responsible kept everything and the rest looked to her for support.

It is foolish to build by a river, whether it floods right now or not. This is basic common sense. I spoke with an eleven year old girl at the swim club and she stated the same. It does not make sense to build where it floods.

The developer wants to make money. Our current mayor is giving into the developers.
What is the real reason for our leadership's weakness?

Reply

Leave a comment