Freeholders Reject Bergen County Police, Sheriff Merger [POLL]
Effort to eliminate county police department is defeated in 3-2 vote.
The Bergen County Freeholders on Wednesday voted against an ordinance to disband the county’s 89-member police department and merge it with the sheriff’s office, northjersey.com reported.
The vote came after more than a year of debate, two studies and legal action. In a 3-2 vote with two abstentions, the board nixed the ordinance after initially approving it on first reading in August with a 4-2 vote.
County Executive Kathleen Donovan, a strong supporter of the county police, had vowed to veto a vote to disband the department and called the idea “idiotic” at a freeholder work session.
Freeholders Maura DeNicola and Robert Hermansen voted against the merger, along with Freeholder David Ganz, who first voted for the measure in August. Freeholders John Driscoll and Joan Voss abstained, while John Mitchell and John Felice voted in favor, the report said.
A study released last year by Guidepost Solutions recommended eliminating the county police department, while a task force formed by Donovan rejected the consultant’s conclusion. Donovan and fellow Republican Sheriff Michael Saudino have repeatedly sparred on the issue.
Donovan had sued to stop the freeholder vote and a non-binding referendum on the consolidation, leading a judge to block the public vote. A Bergen County GOP poll obtained by The Record found voters favored merging the county police into the sheriff’s office.
Related Stories:
- Freeholders Vote to Dissolve Bergen County Police
- County Police Merger is 'Nonsense,' Ex-Officials Say
- Donovan Sues Freeholders to Stop County Police Merger
- Bergen Residents Want Details on County Police Merger
- Two Freeholders Plan ‘Listening Tour’ on County Police Merger
- Donovan, Saudino Spar As Task Force Rejects Cutting County Police
- The Fight Over The Future Of A $22 Million Police Department
Mark W
10:01 am on Thursday, October 4, 2012
"Freeholders John Driscoll and Joan Voss abstained"... pathetic! Why are you holding a position as a freeholder if you can't even vote? Take a stand and vote for it or against, but abstaining just seems like a dereliction of your duties!
Denise
12:24 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012
The 2 that didn't vote are cowards......What are thier reasons for abstaining?
Keith Kaplan
11:44 am on Thursday, October 4, 2012
Running for election.... shared services!!!!
Elected..... Don't disrupt home rule no matter how duplicative it is.
What difference does it make that the Teaneck Police, County Police AND Sheriff all patrol the same area?
abc
12:17 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012
Welcome to NJ, home of corruption.
Go Figure
12:24 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012
I feel bad for the officers of the Bergen County Police Department. After seeing this vote I feel that this is just a political football. They are being thrown back and forth and it isn't fair. Mr. Ganz and Ms. Voss -- shame on you. He changes his vote and she doesn't vote. What are they thinking? Same garbage going on in Hackensack. How about we start really running this county for the people instead of ourselves????
Baba O'Riley
12:37 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012
How can Mr. Ganz and Ms. Voss abstain on a critical vote / issue such as this unless they have a vested interest in either or both of the departments!? They should have recused themselves and stated why (they are doing such) and not look foolish.
J.C. Lee
1:37 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012
This whole situation makes all of the Freeholders and the County Executive look foolish. This is all about political power and anyone who thinks there will be any savings for the taxpower is equally foolish.
Nick
2:35 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012
If you abstain, you should resign. What good are you if you won't vote on important issues.
jp1
2:44 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012
No backbone or much of anything else.
Gabriel Francis
4:48 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012
Those corrupt individuals responsible for tossing this political football around are Mitchell, Felice, Yudin, Cardinale, Molinelly and Saudino. About time someone stood up to the good old boys who put public safety at risk with no plan. Their motives were as clear as day. Vote them out now!!!
barry
8:55 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012
Abstaining means they are hiding something like voting "present" like Obama always did.
Robert
11:20 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012
Joan Voss is just interested in maintaining her seat. She has no other interest then collecting three pensions plus Social Security. How could she sit through all of the hearings as well as public hearings and have no opinion?
Typical waste of taxpayer dollars.
Rona
11:19 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012
The stupidity continues everyone is frightened to disband the strong police unions. In the meanwhile taxpayers will suffer the consequences. This all comes to a head at some point regardless of the argument by the unions that things were "promised or negotiated in the past". Of course it just got bowled over again, and the current administration stays in favor. Hey people we need to get out to vote to represent the taxpayer and not the special interests. We can't continue to overpay, allow people to get unrealistic wage increases on top of already healthy salaries, retire early collect benefits at a very early age, and utilize Cadillac health insurance.
USA1
11:17 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012
Freeholders John Driscoll and Joan Voss abstained, are very week and should be ashamed of themselves. Donovan is bug eyed and full of hot air, she makes me ashamed I am a Republican and voted for her.
Howard L. Pearl
8:32 am on Friday, October 5, 2012
I find it difficult to understand how TWO FREEHOLDERS abstained. On such an important issue, everyone should research the issue and weigh in. Sitting on the fence is not an acceptable position.
Mark W
5:27 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012
While I don't usually write our politicians, I feel that Ms. Voss and Mr. Driscoll's abstention on this matter deserves further scrutiny. If you are interested in contacting them yourself, their email addresses can be found at:
http://www.co.bergen.nj.us/freeholders/default.html
Mark W
4:21 pm on Saturday, October 6, 2012
I received a response from Mr. Driscoll stating that he released the following statement regarding his vote:
http://blog.northjersey.com/bergenbeat/5326/driscoll-explains-why-he-abstained-on-county-police-vote/
Mike Kupchik
8:13 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012
Though will not disclose my direction, have noted which way all voted on this, but please note the two" opting-out well-deserve to lose the next election, for missing a backbone.
delgado
8:50 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012
the real backstory is double dipper Donovan wanted to protect her cronyism at the BCPD. The new $195,000 pr year acting BCPD Police Chief Higgins own mommy gave Donovan big political contributions. Also the millionaires Bergen County Police Chiefs Association supported Donovan and they wanted the BCPD to be disbanded... and they pushed for it, but they also supported double dipper Donovan. The real winners are the Democrats, because no one is as courrpt as these Bergen Republicans... imho
Rona
10:04 pm on Saturday, October 6, 2012
2 out of 7 total votes that's almost 30% not even voting on an important issue like this. O.K. Who owes someone a favor or who knows something bad about someone else. Or who is afraid of their career while putting the rest of us out to pay ever higher taxes. Put it on the referendum and see where it goes
Jeff tammen
5:11 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
What a waste of space shit or get off the pot. Make a vote yes or no. Make a decision or its wasted